Digital Educational Innovation in the Social Economy: A Configurational Analysis Using the Technological Innovation Systems Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15678/SER.2026.1.01Keywords:
education, digital, innovation, social economy, technological innovation frameworkAbstract
Background: Although digitalisation delivers business-level benefits and higher education institutions (HEIs) are expected to advance the digital social economy (SE), many universities still lack coherent digital transformation strategies. Consequently, SE curricula do not integrate digital tools and competences adequately, thus limiting the graduates’ ability to address complex social challenges.
Research objectives: This study examined how digital competences are integrated into SE education not merely instrumentally but as a substantive learning domain. It asked: (a) how SE initiatives teach digital and technological innovation and (b) what system functions enable the development and scaling of such innovations.
Research design and methods: Using the technological innovation systems framework, the study involved a configurational analysis of eight cases of SE education in four European countries.
Results: Three clusters emerge, namely civic platforms, institutional living labs, and lifelong learning initiatives, which reflect distinct constellations of enabling conditions shaped by institutional density, funding logics, and regional disparities.
Conclusions: The findings challenge universal models of digital SE education, underscoring the need for context-sensitive and pluralistic implementation strategies.
Downloads
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003
Bingham, A. J. (2023). From Data Management to Actionable Findings: A Five-Phase Process of Qualitative Data Analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183620
Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2013). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039
Buck, C., Heim, L., Körner-Wyrtki, K., Krombacher, A., & Röglinger, M. (2025). Making the most of digital social innovation: An exploration into success factors. Journal of Business Research, 190, 115215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115215
Castro, G. M. D., Delgado-Verde, M., Amores-Salvadó, J., & Navas-López, J. E. (2013). Linking human, technological, and relational assets to technological innovation: exploring a new approach. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 11(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.8
Chen, N., & Shabbir, M. S. (2024). Social entrepreneurship education landscape mapping: A bibliometric analysis and analysis of empirical research. The International Journal of Management Education, 23(2), 101122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101122
Ćwiklicki, M., Pilch, K. (2021). Multiple case study design: The example of place marketing research. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 17, 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-020-00159-2
del-Corte-Lora, V., Martínez-Fernández, T., Vallet-Bellmunt, T., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2023). A configurational approach to innovation performance: The role of creativity. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 7(3), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2023.03.001
DigiSE5.0. (2025a). Integrating digital value creation labs in social economy studies: Final study under Work Package 2. Erasmus+ Programme Programme (2024-1-PL01-KA220-HED-000252300), co-funded by the European Union. https://digise5.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/FINAL-STUDY-WP2-2.pdf
DigiSE5.0. (2025b). State of the art report on digital value creation and living labs application in social economy–related faculties. Erasmus+ Programme (2024-1-PL01-KA220-HED-000252300), co-funded by the European Union. https://digise5.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/State-of-the-art-report-on-Digital-Value-Creation-and-Living-Labs-application-in-SE-related-faculties-1.pdf
Erzurumlu, S. S., Erzurumlu, Y. O., & Yoon, Y. (2022). National innovation systems and dynamic impact of institutional structures on national innovation capability: A configurational approach with the OKID method. Technovation, 114, 102552. https://10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102552
European Commission. (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Digital Education Action Plan 2021-2027 – Resetting education and training for the digital age (COM/2020/624 final). EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0624
European Commission. (2021). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Building an economy that works for people: An action plan for the social economy. Document 52021DC0778 (COM/2021/778 final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0778
European Commission. (2022). Transition Pathway for Proximity and Social Economy. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/52015
European Commission. (2025). Europe’s Digital Decade: digital targets for 2030. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/europes-digital-decade-digital-targets-2030_en
Fiss, P. C. (2009). Case studies and the configurational analysis of organizational phenomena. Handbook of case study methods, 424–440.
Gagliardi D., Psarra F., Wintjes R., Trendafili K., Pineda Mendoza J., Haaland K., Turkeli S., Giotitsas C., Pazaitis A., Niglia F., (2020), New Technologies and Digitisation: Opportunities and Challenges for the Social Economy and Social Enterprises. European Commission, Executive Agency for SMEs, https://doi.org/10.2826/667682
Galindo-Martín, M., Castaño-Martínez, M., & Méndez-Picazo, M. (2023). Digitalisation, entrepreneurship and competitiveness: an analysis from 19 European countries. Review of Managerial Science, 17(5), 1809–1826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00640-1
Greene, D., & David, J. L. (1984). A research design for generalizing from multiple case studies. Evaluation and program planning, 7(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(84)90027-2
Gregori, P., & Holzmann, P. (2020). Digital sustainable entrepreneurship: A business model perspective on embedding digital technologies for social and environmental value creation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122817 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122817
Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002
Howaldt, J., Schröder, A., Kaletka, C., Rehfeld, D., & Terstriep, J. (2016). Comparative Analysis (Mapping 1)-Mapping the World of Social Innovation: A Global Comparative Analysis across Sectors and World Regions (D1. 4). TU Dortmund University. Retrieved September, 2025, https://www.si-drive.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/SI-DRIVE-D1-4-Comparative-Analysis-2016-07-13-final-2.pdf
Howorth, C., Smith, S. M., & Parkinson, C. (2012). Social Learning and Social Entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11(3), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0022
Huang, S., Burton‐Jones, A., & Xu, D. (2024). A configurational theory of digital disruption. Information Systems Journal, 34(5), 1737–1786. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12510
Inceoglu, I., Vanacker, T., & Vismara, S. (2024). Digitalization and resource mobilization. British Journal of Management, 35, 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12817
Kazantsev, N., Batolas, D., & White, L. (2024). Managing asymmetries for data mobilization under digital transformation. British Journal of Management, 35, 663–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12809
Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nyström, A. (2012). Living Labs as Open-Innovation Networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/602
Leonhardt, D., Hanelt, A., Huang, P., & Mithas, S. (2018). Does one size fit all? Theorizing governance configurations for digital innovation. Thirty Ninth International Conference on Information Systems, San Francisco 2018
Leppänen, P., George, G., & Alexy, O. (2023). When do novel business models lead to high performance? A configurational approach to value drivers, competitive strategy, and firm environment. Academy of Management Journal, 66(1), 164–194. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2020.0969
Meadows, Donella H. 2009. Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Earthscan.
Marques, P., Morgan, K., & Richardson, R. (2020). Social innovation in question: The theoretical and practical implications of a contested concept. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 38(7–8), 1246–1263. https://doi.org/10.1177/239965441771798
Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S. & Hinings, C. R. 1993. Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1175–1195. https://doi.org/10.2307/256809
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254
Patton M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.) Sage.
Qureshi, I., Pan, S. L., & Zheng, Y. (2021). Digital social innovation: An overview and research framework. Information Systems Journal, 31(5), 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12362
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
Shahid, S. M., & Alarifi, G. (2021). Social entrepreneurship education: A conceptual framework and review. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(3), 100533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100533
Westerlund, M., Leminen, S., & Habib, C. (2018). Key constructs and a definition of living labs as innovation platforms. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1205
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Inc.
Zahra, S. A., Liu, W., & Si, S. (2023). How digital technology promotes entrepreneurship in ecosystems. Technovation, 119, 102457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102457
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Federica Bandini, Paola Canestrini, Marek Ćwiklicki, Christina Galani, Stergios Kyratzopoulos, Sofia Kantsiou, Norbert Laurisz, Stratos Nalmpantis, Kamila Pilch, Maria Vittoria Prudentino, Eirini Erifyli Tzekou
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
