Implementation of EU policy on circular economy and social inclusion in Poland – opportunities for synergies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15678/SER.2023.1.02Keywords:
circular economy, social inclusion, social policy, European Union, strategyAbstract
Background: The circular economy (CE) is a concept that is increasingly influencing European Union (EU) policy. Environmental goals are being increasingly financed by European funds. This approach culminates in the new Community Strategy – the European Green Deal. At the same time, EU funds have also been earmarked for social objectives for decades, a fundamental element of cohesion policy. Both CE and social policy measures are implemented with structural funds, through appropriate provisions in national and regional programs. Despite the fact that many activities from both areas are part of sustainable development, Polish strategic programs do not provide for joint activities that affect both environmental and social issues. The article analysed Polish national programs in terms of pro-environmental and social measures. The choice of the research topic is related to the fact that increasingly in the literature there are calls for the inclusion of social issues in the CE theme.
Research objectives: The aim of the research is to characterize national programs in Poland dedicated to CE and social welfare in the 2014–2020 perspective (Operational Program Infrastructure and Environment, Operational Program Intelligent Development, Operational Program Knowledge Education Development, Eastern Poland Operational Program, Regional Operational Program for Małopolskie Voivodeship), to identify challenges in narrowing the use of a narrowed understanding of pro-environmental measures, and to propose an approach that takes into account the synergies of the two areas in the context of the 2021–2027 perspective.
Research design and methods: The article uses an analysis of EU documents (regulations and directives; structural and investment programs), Polish national and regional programs. A compilation of priority axes from key programs related to CE and social policy in Poland was made, and then a combination of selected areas was proposed.
Results: As the analysis shows, the solutions used in the EU and in Poland in the 2014–2020 perspective do not take into account the social context of the circular economy. The plans for the new financial perspective 2021–2027, as well as the long-term strategy of the European Green Deal, do not exclude joint actions, so it is largely up to the member states to focus separately on selected aspects of CE and social inclusion, or to combine actions in both areas. Planning joint activities in at least part of the programs could contribute to the overarching community goal of sustainable development.
Conclusions: An interdisciplinary approach to the topic of CE, especially the social aspects, could make EU policy more comprehensive and effective in relation to the identified challenges. The EU, which is one of the leaders of pro-environmental changes in the world, should include a broader approach to both CE issues and social policy.
Downloads
References
Anderson, J. (1995). The single European market and beyond: A study of the wider implications of the Single European Act. World Politics, 47, 3, 441–465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100016452
Blomsma, F., Brennan, G. (2017). The emergence of circular economy: A new framing around prolonging resource productivity. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21, 3, 603–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12603 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12603
Cangiani, M. (2011). Karl Polanyi’s institutional theory: Market society and it’s disembedded economy. Journal of Economic Issues, 45, 1, 177–197. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624450110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624450110
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. (2007). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12012P/TXT&from=EN
Council of the European Communities. (1993). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31993R0792&from=EN
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2015). Towards a circular economy: Business rationale for an accelerated transition. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/towards-a-circular-economy-business-rationale-for-anaccelerated-transition
European Commission. (1993). Green Paper – European Social Policy – Options For The Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/434c867b-615c-45bc-950b-2512022c2e8b/language-en.
European Commission. (1994). European social policy – A way forward for the Union – A White Paper. https://
op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/16dfe2c0-7fc9-4079-9481-e5de54a3805a/language-en
European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020. A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
European Commission. (2015). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Closing the loop. An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:8a8ef5e8-99a0-11e5-b3b7-01aa75ed71a1.0012.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
European Commission. (2017). European Pillar of Social Rights – booklet. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/european-pillar-social-rights-booklet_en
European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource. html?uri=cellar:b828d165-1c22-11ea-8c1f-01aa75ed71a1.0002.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
European Commission. (2021a). European agricultural fund for rural development. https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/find-funding/eu-funding-programmes/european-agricultural-fund-rural-developmenteafrd_en
European Commission. (2021b). Oceans and fisheries. https://oceans-and-fisheries.ec.europa.eu/index_en
European Commission. (2021c). European structural and investment funds. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/funding/
European Commission. (2022a). What is ESF+? https://ec.europa.eu/european-social-fund-plus/en/what-esf
European Commission. (2022b). Agreement between the European Commission and Poland on funding through European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund+ (ESF+), the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund (JTF) and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (EMFAF). https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/partnership-agreement-poland-2021-2027_en
European Commission. (2022c). Poland’s recovery and resilience plan. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/recoveryandresilience_poland-factsheet_en.pdf
European Commission. (2022d). Finance and the Green Deal. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/finance-and-green-deal_en
European Commission. (2022e). Recovery and Resilience Facility. https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economyeuro/recovery-coronavirus/recovery-and-resilience-facility_en
European Commission. (2022f). Annex to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of the Regions. The European Green Deal. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:b828d165-1c22-11ea-8c1f-01aa75ed71a1.0002.02/DOC_2&format=PDF
European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. (2017). Social Affairs and Inclusion. A new start for social dialogue: one year after. Publications Office. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/2d1df4a6-66ae-11e7-b2f2-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
European Council. (2022). Fit for 55. The EU’s plan for a green transition. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/green-deal/fit-for-55-the-eu-plan-for-a-green-transition/
European Council. (1988). Council Regulation (EEC) No 2052 / 88 of 24 June 1988 on the tasks of the Structural Funds and their effectiveness and on coordination of their activities between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31988R2052&from=EN
European Parliament. (2021). European Social Fund Plus. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/53/european-social-fund-plus
European Parliament. (2022). Multiannual financial framework. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/29/multiannual-financial-framework
European Parliament & Council of the European Union (2021a). Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and The Council of the European Union of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32021R1119&from=EN
European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2021b). Regulation (EU) 2021/1058 of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union of 24 June 2021 on the European Regional Development Fund and on the Cohesion Fund. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32021R1058&from=PL
European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2021c). Regulation (EE) 2021/1056 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 establishing the Just Transition Fund. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32021R1056&from=EN
Flisowska, J., Moore, C. (2019). Just Transition or Just Talk. Climate Action Network Europe and Sandbag. https://caneurope.org/content/uploads/2019/05/Just-Transition-or-Just-Talk-Report.pdf
Geissdoerfer, M. et al. (2017). The circular economy: a new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, Feb., 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balancedinterplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32. https://doi. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
Häusermann, S., Garritzmann, J. L., & Palier, B. (2022). The politics of social investment: A global theoretical framework. In J. L. Garritzmann, S. Häusermann, & B. Palier (Eds.), The world politics of social investment (Volume I): Welfare states in the knowledge economy. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197585245.001.0001
Hirsch, P., Levin, D. (1999). Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model. Organization Science, 10, 2, 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.2.199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.2.199
Hobson, K., Lynch, N. (2016). Diversifying and de-growing the circular economy: Radical social transformation in a resource-scarce world. Futures, 82, 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.012
Holmes, H., Wieser, H., & Kasmire, J. (2021). Critical approaches to circular economy research: Time, space and evolution. In R. B. Swain & S. Sweet (Eds.), Sustainable consumption and production (volume II): Circular economy and beyond (pp. 55–74). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-030-55285-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55285-5_4
Kama, K. (2015). Circling the economy: Resource-making and marketization in EU electronic waste policy. Area 47, 1, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12143
Khan, O., Daddi, T., & Iraldo, F. (2021). Sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring: Key capabilities and organizational routines for circular economy implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 125565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125565 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125565
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
Klein, R., Nicholls, R., & Thomalla, F. (2003). Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept? Environmental Hazards, 5, 1–2, 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazards.2004.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazards.2004.02.001
Koch, M. (2022). Social policy without growth: Moving towards sustainable welfare states. Social Policy and Society, 21, 3, 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746421000361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746421000361
Korhonen, J., Nuur, C., Feldmann, A., Birkie, S. E. (2018). Circular economy as an essentially contested concept. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 544–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111
Laurent, E. (2020). The European Green Deal: Bring back the new. OFCE Policy Briefs, 63. https://www.ofce.sciences-po.fr/pdf/pbrief/2020/OFCEpbrief63.pdf
Mavropoulos, A., & Nilsen, A. W. (2020). Industry 4.0 and circular economy: Towards a wasteless future or a wasteful planet? Wiley.
Meadows, D. H. , Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens W. W. (1972). The limits to growth. A Report for the club of rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1349/ddlp.1
Merli, R., Preziosi, M., Acampora, A. (2018). How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 20 March, 703–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112
Ministry of Funds and Regional Policy. (2022). European funds for infrastructure, climate, environment 2021–2027. https://www.pois.gov.pl/media/111462/FEnIKS_21_27_przyjety_przez_KE.pdf
Office of the Prime Minister. (2022). Appendix to Resolution no. 48/2022 of the Council of Ministers of March 11, 2022. European funds for social development social development 2021–2027. https://www.power.gov.pl/media/108159/PROGRAM_FERS.pdf
Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Beacon.
Sauve, S., Bernard S., Sloan P. (2016). Environmental sciences, sustainable development and circular economy: Alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary research. Environmental Development, 17, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002
Single European Act. (1986). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:11986U/TXT&from=EN
Treaty of Rome. (1957). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:11957E/TXT&from=PL
Treaty of Amsterdam. (1997). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:11997D/TXT&from=EN
Treaty on European Union. (1992). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:11992M/TXT&from=EN
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. (2007). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT&from=EN
Vaughan-Whitehead, D. (2015). The European social model in crisis. Is Europe losing its soul?. International Labour Office Geneva. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/publication/wcms_630617.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783476565
Webster, K. (2013). What might we say about a circular economy? Some temptations to avoid if possible. World Futures: The Journal of New Paradigm Research, 69, 7–8, 542–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2013.835977 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2013.835977
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Social Entrepreneurship Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
