The tragic science: how economists cause harm (even as they aspire to do good) by George F. DeMartino
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15678/SER.2022.2.001Keywords:
harm, causality, moral geometry, cost-benefit analysis, uncertainty, welfare economicsAbstract
Book review: DeMartino, G. F. (2022). The Tragic Science: How economists Cause Harm (Even as They Aspire to Do Good). University of Chicago Press (pp. 272)
This paper discusses the book The tragic science: how economists cause harm (even as they aspire to do good) by M. George F. DeMartino. The Author criticizes the moral geometry used by economists to evaluate harm, arguing for a more multifaceted understanding of harm that considers epistemic uncertainty. While the book under review lacks a systematic study of the moral dimension of harm, the Author’s versatility and scholarship are admirable, making it an inspiring read for both casual readers and professionals in economics and philosophy.
Downloads
References
DeMartino, G. F. (2016). “Econogenic harm”: On the nature of and responsibility for the harm economists do as they try to do good. In G. F. DeMartino, & D. McCloskey (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Professional Economic Ethics (pp. 71–98). Oxford Handbooks.
DeMartino, G. F. (2011). The economist’s oath: On the need for and content of professional economic ethics. Oxford University Press.
DeMartino, G. F. (2022). The tragic science: how economists cause harm (even as they aspire to do good). University of Chicago Press
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2023-12-01 (2)
- 2022-12-31 (1)
