Decarbonization Obstacles in the Context of the Photovoltaic Market Development in Poland From the Social (Prosumers’) Perspective

Authors

  • Izabela Jonek-Kowalska Silesian University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15678/

Keywords:

decarbonization, photovoltaic market in social research, prosumers’ decisions and behavior, renewable energy sources

Abstract

Background: Decarbonization of economies is a key development priority of the European Union. As nonrenewable fuels prevail in Poland’s energy balance, the country has faced serious problems regarding priority implementation for many years.

Research objectives: Given the said circumstances, the objective of this article is to identify obstacles to using renewable energy sources (solar energy) from the prosumers’ perspective.

Research design and methods: During the research, I used the results of surveys conducted on a representative sample of 754 Polish prosumers. The results underwent an analysis based on descriptive statistics and nonparametric statistical tests, including Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: The major obstacles to the development of photovoltaics in Poland from the prosumers’ perspective include financial difficulties, mainly the costs of photovoltaic system installation and insufficient state subsidies for such products.

Conclusions: Hence, the state activities aimed at promoting decarbonization must consider extending the financial support for photovoltaics, simplifying the procedures to apply for RES funding, and stabilizing the conditions of transaction cost settlements on the photovoltaic market.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amoah, A., Kwablah, E., Korle, K., Offei, D. (2020). Renewable energy consumption in Africa: The role of economic well-being and economic freedom. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 10, 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-020-00264-3

An, J., Hong, T., & Lee, M. (2022). Determining the optimal trading price of electricity for energy consumers and prosumers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 154, 111851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111851

Asif, M. H., Zhongfu, T., Dilanchiev, A., Irfan, M., Eyvazov, E., Ahmad, B. (2023). Determining the influencing factors of consumers’ attitude toward renewable energy adoption in developing countries: A roadmap toward environmental sustainability and green energy technologies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 47861–47872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25662-w

Botelho, D. F., de Oliveira, L. W., Dias, B. H., Soares, T. A., & Moraes, C. A. (2022). Prosumer integration into the Brazilian energy sector: An overview of innovative business models and regulatory challenges. Energy Policy, 161, 112735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112735

Bratnicka-Myśliwiec, K., Wronka-Pośpiech, M., & Ingram, T. (2019). Does socioemotional wealth matter for competitive advantage? A case of Polish family businesses. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 15(1), 123–146.

Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 938–956. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.938

Businge, C. N., & Mazzoleni, M. (2023). Impact of circular economy on the decarbonization of the Italian residential sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 408, 136949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136949

Deka, A., Cavusoglu, B., Dube, S., Rukani, S., & Kadir, M. O. (2023). Examining the effect of renewable energy on exchange rate in the emerging economies with dynamic ARDL bounds test approach. Renewable Energy Focus, 44, 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2023.01.003

Ecker, F., Hahnel, U. J. J., & Spada, H. (2017). Promoting decentralized sustainable energy systems in different supply scenarios: The role of autarky aspiration. Frontiers in Energy Research, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2017.00014

Espadinha, J., Bapista, P., & Neves, D. (2023). Assessing P2P energy markets contribution for 2050 decarbonization goals. Sustainable Cities and Society, 92, 104495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104495

Fernandez, E., Hossain, M. J., Nawazish Ali, S. M., & Sharma, V. (2023). An efficient P2P energy trading platform based on evolutionary games for prosumers in a community. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 34, 101074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2023.101074

Forcan, J., & Forcan, M. (2023). Behavior of prosumers in Smart Grid: A comparison of net energy metering and billing schemes, and game theory-based local electricity market. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 34, 101058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2023.101058

Galvin, R. (2020). Yes, there is enough money to decarbonize the economies of high-income countries justly and sustainably. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 101739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101739

Georgarakis, E., Bauwens, T., Pronk, A. M., & AlSkaif, T. (2021). Keep it green, simple and socially fair: A choice experiment on prosumers’ preferences for peer-to-peer electricity trading in the Netherlands. Energy Policy, 159, 112615.

Higueras-Castillo, E., Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J., Muñoz-Leiva, F., Molinillo, S. (2019). The role of collectivism in modeling the adoption of renewable energies: A cross-cultural approach. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16, 2143–2160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02235-4

Hillman, J., Axon, S., & Morrissey, J. (2018). Social enterprise as a potential niche innovation breakout for low carbon transition. Energy Policy, 117, 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.038

Huang, T., Sun, Y., Jiao, M., Liu, Z., & Hao, J. (2022). Bilateral energy-trading model with hierarchical personalized pricing in a prosumer community. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 141, 108179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.108179

Isah, A., Dioha, M. O., Debnath, R. (2023). Financing renewable energy: policy insights from Brazil and Nigeria. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 13, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-022-00379-9

Jonek-Kowalska, I. (2023). Motives for the use of photovoltaic installations in Poland against the background of the share of solar energy in the structure of energy resources in the developing economies of Central and Eastern Europe. Resources, 12, 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12080088

Korcaj, L., Hahnel, U. J. J., & Spada, H. (2015). Intentions to adopt photovoltaic systems depend on homeowners’ expected personal gains and behavior of peers. Renewable Energy, 75, 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.007

Kumar. J, C. R., & Majid, M. A. (2020). Renewable energy for sustainable development in India: Current status, future prospects, challenges, employment, and investment opportunities. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 10, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-019-0232-1

Li, G., Li, Q., Yang, X., & Ding, R. (2022). General Nash bargaining based direct P2P energy trading among prosumers under multiple uncertainties. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 143, 108403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.108403

Liao, Q., Sun, K., & Wang, J. (2023). A new platform for clean energy and sustainable environment in the new era of decarbonization. DeCarbon, 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.decarb.2023.100001

Lis, A., & Stankiewicz, P. (2017). Framing shale gas for policy-making in Poland. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1143355

Mensin, Y., Ketjoy, N., Chamsa-ard, W., Kaewpanha, M., & Mensin, P. (2022). Energy Reports, 8, 14289–14303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.400

Moghadam, A. Z., & Javidi, M. H. (2022). Designing a two-stage transactive energy system for future distribution networks in the presence of prosumers’ P2P transactions. Electric Power Systems Research, 211, 108202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108202

Mularczyk, A., Zdonek, I., Turek, M., & Tokarski, S. (2022). Intentions to use prosumer photovoltaic technology in Poland. Energies, 15, 6300. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176300

Osorio-Aravena, J. C., de la Casa, J., Töfflinger, J. A., & Mũnoz-Cerón, E. (2021). Identifying barriers and opportunities in the deployment of the residential photovoltaic prosumer segment in Chile. Sustainable Cities and Society, 69, 102824.

Patterson-Hann, V., & Watson, P. (2022). The precursors of acceptance for a prosumer-led transition to a future smart grid. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(3), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1896698

Paudel, A., Chaudhari, K., Long, C., & Gooi, H. B. (2019). Peer-to-Peer energy trading in a prosumer-based community microgrid: A game-theoretic model. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron, 66, 6087–6097. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2018.2874578

Pavlowsky, C., Koch, J., & Gliedt, T. (2023). Place attachment and social barriers to large-scale renewable energy development: A social–ecological systems analysis of a failed wind energy project in the south-central United States. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 5, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-023-00142-0

Raza, S. A., Shah, N., & Khan, K. A. (2020). Residential energy environmental Kuznets curve in emerging economies: The role of economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and financial development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 5620–5629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06356-8

Rodin, V., & Moser, S. (2022). From theory to practice: Supporting industrial decarbonization and energy cooperation in Austria. Energy Research & Social Science, 94, 102863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102863

Römer, B., Reichhart, P., & Picot, A. (2015). Smart energy for Robinson Crusoe: An empirical analysis of the adoption of IS-enhanced electricity storage systems. Electronic Markets, 25, 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-014-0167-5

Skjærseth, J. B. (2018). Implementing EU climate and energy policies in Poland: Policy feedback and reform. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 498–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1429046

Solorio, I., & Jörgens, H. (2020). Contested energy transition? Europeanization and authority turns in EU renewable energy policy. Journal of European Integration, 42(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1708342

Sotnyk, I., Kurbatova, T., Trypolska, G., Sokhan, I., & Koshel, V. (2023). Research trends on development of energy efficiency and renewable energy in households: A bibliometric analysis. Environmental Economics, 14(2), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.14(2).2023.02

Süsser, D., & Kannen, A. (2017). ‘Renewables? Yes, please!’: Perceptions and assessment of community transition induced by renewable-energy projects in North Frisia. Sustainable Science, 12, 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0433-5

Štreimikienė, D., & Baležentis, A. (2015). Assessment of willingness to pay for renewables in Lithuanian households. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 17, 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0810-z

Tushar, W., Saha, T. K., Yuen, C., Morstyn, T., McCulloch, M. D., Poor, H. V., & Wood, K. L. (2019). A motivational game-theoretic approach for peer-to-peer energy trading in the smart grid. Applied Energy, 243, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2019.03.111

Uddin, S. N., Taplin, R., & Yu, X. (2010). Towards a sustainable energy future—exploring current barriers and potential solutions in Thailand. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 12, 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-008-9180-1

Umer, K., Huang, Q., Khorasany, M., Amin, W., & Afzal, M. (2023). A novel prosumer-centric approach for social welfare maximization considering network voltage constraints in peer-to-peer energy markets. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 147, 108820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.108820

van der Horst, D. (2008). Social enterprise and renewable energy: Emerging initiatives and communities of practice. Social Enterprise Journal, 4(3), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508610810922686

Véliz, K., Silva, D. S., & Hernández, B. (2023). Vision for a sustainable energy transition and decarbonization: A case study of students surveyed at a Chilean University. Heliyon, 9(11), e21534.

Wronka-Pośpiech, M. (2023). The role of social entrepreneurship in decarbonization: A new avenue for social enterprises. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, Management and Organization Series, 177, 690–709. http://dx.doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2023.177.40

Wronka-Pośpiech, M., Frączkiewicz-Wronka, A., & Laska, K. (2016). Risk perception in the activity of social enterprises. Risk Management in Public Administration, 1, 189–226.

Xiang, D., Jiao, G., Sun, B., Peng, Ch., & Ran, Y. (2022). Prosumer-to-customer exchange in the sharing economy: Evidence from the P2P accommodation context. Journal of Business Research, 145, 426–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.077

Yang, R. J., & Zou, P. X. W. (2016). Building integrated photovoltaics (BIPV): Costs, benefits, risks, barriers and improvement strategy. International Journal of Construction Management, 16(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2015.1117709

Yousaf, H., Amin, A., Baloch, A., Akbar, M. (2021). Investigating household sector’s non-renewables, biomass energy consumption and carbon emissions for Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 40824–40834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12990-y

Zdonek, I., Mularczyk, A., Turek, M., & Tokarski, S. (2023). Perception of prosumer photovoltaic technology in Poland: Usability, ease of use, attitudes, and purchase intentions. Energies, 16, 4674. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16124674

Zeng, Y., Wei, X., Yao, Y., Xu, X., Sun, S., Chan, W. K. V., & Feng, W. (2023). Determining the pricing and deployment strategy for virtual power plants of peer-to-peer prosumers: A game-theoretic approach. Applied Energy, 345, 121349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121349

Downloads

Published

2024-06-29

How to Cite

Jonek-Kowalska, I. (2024). Decarbonization Obstacles in the Context of the Photovoltaic Market Development in Poland From the Social (Prosumers’) Perspective. Social Entrepreneurship Review, 1. https://doi.org/10.15678/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 119

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.