Innovative Public Governance. The Finnish Welfare State Model

Authors

  • Natalia Kohtamäki

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15678/SER.2022.2.01

Keywords:

innovation, public governance, welfare state, enabling state, regionality, administration, public services

Abstract

Background: The rationality of developing citizen-friendly solutions is demonstrated by the state helping citizens, Finland has own pattern of public governance based inter alia on the ideals of New Public Management. As a peripheral country quite remote from the largest European centres of power such as Germany or France, it represents unique way of innovation in the welfare state model.

Research objectives: The paper discusses the specifics of Finnish solutions in the field of public management. The present analysis was carried out based on the dependence of those solutions on cultural conditions.

Research design and methods: The choice of Finland is justified by its leading position in various world rankings regarding its commitment to traditional regional values related to open public administration, the transparency of its operations, and public participation in governance processes, the social welfare state. The study uses secondary sources and applies systematic analysis.

Results: Finland is seen as a latecomer in developing a welfare state, in part because of its rural and agrarian social structure. This process was strengthened by Finland’s special position between East and West during the Cold War.

Conclusions: Finnish administrative culture stems directly from the innovative forms of public management developed among the Nordic countries. Finland is a model example of a country exhibiting rational, knowledge-driven progress and maintaining simplicity in developing citizen-friendly solutions

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adler-Nissen, R., and U.P. Gad (2014). “Introduction: Postimperial Sovereignty Games in the Nordic Region”. Cooperation and Conflict 49, 1, 3-32.

Adorno, T. and M. Horkheimer (2002). Dialectics of Enlightment. Philosophical Fragments. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Agger, B (1991). “Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, Postmodernism: Their Sociological Relevance”, Annual Review of Sociology 17, 105-131.

Alapuro, R. (2019). State and Revolution in Finland. Leiden: Brill.

Allen, A. (2015). “The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory”. New York: Columbia University Press.

Arter, D. (2010). “The Breakthrough of Another West European Populist Radical Right Party? The Case of the True Finn”. Government and Opposition 45, 4, 484-504.

Bengtsson, Å. (2014). “Nordic Countries are Not as Similar or as ‘Exceptional’ as Conventional Wisdom Would Suggest”. LSE Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2014/03/28/nordic-countries-are-not-as-similar-or-as-exceptional-as-conventional-wisdom-in-political-science-would-suggest/ .

Bengtsson, E., A. Missiaia, I. Nummela, and M. Olsson (2019). “Unequal Poverty and Equal Industrialization: Finnish Wealth, 1750-1900”. Scandinavian Ecomic History Review 67, 3, 229-248.

Bjørnskov, C. (2008). “Social Trust and Fractionalization: A Possible Reinterpretation”. European Sociological Review 24, 3, 271–283.

Borevi, K. (2020). “Scandinavian Responses to Immigration”, Länderprofile Migration. https://www.bpb.de/gesellschaft/migration/laenderprofile/northerneurope/308794/scandinavian-responses-to-immigration.

Browning, C.S. (2008). Constructivism, Narrative and Foreign Policy Analysis: A Case Study of Finland. Bern: Peter Lang.

Christiansen, N.F., and C. Petersen (2001). “The Dynamics of Social Solidarity: The Danish Welfare State, 1900–2000”. Scandinavian Journal of History 26, 3, 177-196.

Conrad, S. (2012). “Enlightment in Global History. A Historiographical Critique”. American Historical Review 117, 4, 999-1027.

Eduskunta (2022) Eduskuntaryhmien voimasuhteet.

https://www.eduskunta.fi/FI/kansanedustajat/tilastot/Sivut/hex8110_Eduskuntaryhmien%20voimasuhteet.aspx.

Eggel, D., A. Liebich, and D. Mancini-Griffoli (2007). “Was Herder a Nationalist?”. Review of Politics 69, 1, 48-78.

Einhorn, E.S., and J. Logue (2004). “Can the Scandinavian Model Adapt to Globalization?”. Scandinavian Studies 76, 4, 501-534.

Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, ed. (1996). Welfare States in Transition. National Adaptations in Global Economies, London: Sage.

Gailišs, E. (2020). “Small Powers in English School Theory of International Relations”. In: Kokina, Irēna, ed. Proceedings of the 62nd International Scientific Conference of Daugavpils University. Daugavpils: Daugavpils University: 110-116.

Gassen, G.R., and A. Maurer (2006). “Von der Pheripherie ins Zentrum. Perspektiven finnischer Europapolitik – für Europa und Deutschland”. Diskussionspapier der FG 1. SWP-Berlin 18.

Grogan, J., and J. Beqiraj (2021). “Rule of Law as a Perimeter of Legitimacy for COVID-19 Responses”. VerfBlog. https://verfassungsblog.de/rule-of-law-as-a-perimeter-of-legitimacy-for-covid-19-responses/, DOI: 10.17176/20210417-101033-0.

Gunnel, J.G. (1982). “The Technocratic Image and the Theory of Technocracy”. Technology and Culture 23, 3, 392-416.

Hecker-Stamphel, J. (2009). “Der Traum von der nordischen Einheit. Definitionen und Abgrenzungen des Nordens im Zweiten Weltkrieg”. In: Hecker-Stamphel, Jan, and Hendriette Kliemann-Geisinger, eds. Facetten des Nordens. Räume-Konstruktionen-Identitäten. Berlin: Nordeuropa-Institut: 175-208.

Hecker-Stampehl, J. (2002). Ist Finnland ein nordisches Land?Der Nordek-Prozess als Fallstudie. Magisterarbeit. Doi: 10.18452/14017. https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/handle/18452/14669.

Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

Iommi, L.G. (2020). “Norm Internalisation Revisited: Norm Contestation and the Life of Norms at the Extreme of the Norm Cascade”, Global Constitutionalism 9, 1, 76-116.

Jungerstam, S., and A. Wentjärvi (2019). “Country Portrait Finland. The Finnish Welfare State”. https://www.socialnet.de/en/international/finland.html.

Keohane, R. (2006). “Lilliputian’s Dilemmas”. In: Ingebritsen, Christine et al., eds. Small States in International Relations. New Directions in Scandinavian Studies (55-61). Washington: University of Washington Press.

Kestilä-Kekkonen, E., and P. Söderlund (2014). “Party, Leader or Candidate? Dissecting the Right-wing Populist Vote in Finland”. European Political Science Review 6, 4, 641-662.

Kettunen, P. (2008). Globalisaatio ja kansallinen me. Kansallisen katseen historiallinen kritiikki [Globalization and the National We. Historical Critique of the National Gaze]. Tampere: Vastapaino.

Kettunen, P. (2001). “The Nordic Welfare State in Finland”. Scandinavian Journal of History 26, 3, 225-246.

Kitschelt, H. (2007). “Growth and Persistence of the Radical Right in Post-Industrial Democracies: Advances and Challenges in Comparative Research”. West European Politics 30, 5, 1176-1206.

Kohtamäki, N. (2017). “Państwa nordyckie wobec procesów europeizacji w agencjach regulacyjnych Unii Europejskiej” [The Nordic Countries and the Processes of the Europeanization in the European Union’s Regulatory Agencies]. Kultura i Polityka 21, 103-117.

Korhonen, K. (2011). “Introduction. The State of Nordic Affairs”. In: Tiilikainen, Teija, and Kaisa Korhonen, eds. Norden – Making a Difference? Possibilities for Enhanced Nordic Cooperation in International affairs. The Norden 2020 Project Report (8-24). Helsinki: FIIA.

Kotiranta, M. (2015). “Religion and the Secular State in Finland”. In: Martínez-Torrón, Javier, W. Cole Durham, and Donlu Thayer, eds. Religion and the Secular State: National Reports Issued for the Occasion of the XVIIIth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law (273-298). Madrid: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

Lejon, K.O., and M. Agnafors (2011). “Less Religion, Better Society? On Religion, Secularity and Prosperity in Scandinavia”. Dialog. A Journal of Theology 50, 3, 297-307.

Martela, F. et al. (2020). “The Nordic Exeptionalism: What Expains Why the Nordic Countries are Constantly Among the Happiest in the World”. In: Helliwell, John H. et al., eds. World Happiness Report (130-145). https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2020/.

Merriam Webster Dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/innovation.

Miles, L. (2015). “Bridging Interdependency? Nordic ‘Yes, but…’ – Integration from a Historical Perspective”. In: Howard Grøn, Caroline, Peter Nedergaard, and Anders Wivel, eds., The Nordic Countries and the European Union. Still the European Community? (15-29). Oxon-New York: Routledge.

Mueller, G.H. (1979). “The Notion of Rationality in the Work of Max Weber”. European Journal of Sociology 20, 1, 149-171.

Musiał, K. (2001). “Nordisch – Nordic – Nordisk. Die wandelbaren Topoi-Funktionen in den deutschen, anglo-amerikanischen und skandinavischen nationalen Diskursen”. In: Bänsch, Alexandra, and Bernd Henningsen, eds. Die kulturelle Konstruktion von Gemeinschaften. Schweden und Deutschland im Modernisierungsprozeß (95-122). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

Ornston, D. (2018). Good Governance Gone Bad: How Nordic Adaptability Leads to Excess. London: Cornell University Press.

Palosaari, T. (2013). “Still a Physician rather than a Judge? The Post-Cold War Foreign and Security Policy of Finland”. Swiss Political Science Review 19, 3, 357-375.

Panke, D. (2010). “Small States in the European Union: Structural Disadvantages in EU Policymaking and Counter-strategies”. Journal of European Public Policy 17, 6, 799-817.

Pawłuszko, T. (2015). “Droga państw nordyckich z peryferii do centrum gospodarki światowej” [The Nordic Countries’ Path from the Periphery to the Center of the World Economy]. In: Tomala, Magdalena, and Michał Łuszczuk, eds. Północ w międzynarodowej przestrzeni politycznej i gospodarczej [The North within the International Political and Economic Space] (195-214). Kielce: UJK.

Peterson, E. (2022). “Views on ‘Good English’ and ‘Nordic Exeptionalism’ in Finland”. Frontiers in Communication 7.

Raitio, J. (2012). “The Source of Law – Doctrine and Reasoning in Finland”, US-China Education Review B11, 1-12.

Rizzo, F. (2006). Finnish Administrative Reforms in the 1990s : the Role of the Regional Councils within Regional Policy Governance. Master Thesis. https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/8459.

Rocco, C. (1994). “Between Modernity and Postmodernity: Reading Dialectic of Enlightment against the Grain”, Political Theory 22, 1, 71-97.

Savolainen, J. (2021). “The Grim Secret of Nordic Happiness”. https://slate.com/nersonews-and-politics/2021/04/finland-happiness-lagomhygge.html.

Sinkkonen, V., and H. Vogt (2015). “Utopias, Counterfactuals and External Affairs: (Re)visioning Foreign Policy in a Small Country Context”. European Review of International Studies 2, 2: 66-83.

Skirbekk, G. (2011). Multiple Modernities. A Tale of Scandinavian Experiences. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

Spiekermann, K., and H. Aalbu (2004). “Nordic Peripheriality in Europe”. Nordregio Working Paper 2.

Statistics Finland. “Maahanmuutto”. https://www.stat.fi/tup/maahanmuutto/uth-tutkimus/yhteenveto_en.html.

Statistics Sweden. “Summary of Population. Statistics 1960-2020”. https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statistics-by-subject-area/population/population-composition/population-statistics/pong/tables-and-graphs/yearly-statistics--the-whole-country/summary-of-population-statistics/.

Strang, J. (2013). Nordic Communities. A Vision for Future. Copenhagen: Nordic Council.

Suorsa, K. (2005). “Regionality, Innovation Policy and Peripherial Policy in Finland, Sweden and Norway”. FENNIA 185, 1, 15-29.

Thorkildsen, D. (1997). “Religious Identity and Nordic Identity”. In: Sørensen, Øystein, and Bo Stråth, eds. The Cultural Construction of Norden (138-160). Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.

Tönnies, F. (2012). Studien zu Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft, (Hrsg. von Klaus Lichtblau). Wiesbaden: Springer.

Vik, H. H., Jensen, S. L., Lindkvist, L., and Strang, J. (2018). Histories of Human Rights in the Nordic Countries. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 36, 189-201.

Vogt, H. (2009). “Zwischen Pragmatismus und Moralismus: Überlegungen zum Finnischen und Skandinavischen Internationalismus”. Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft 3, 139-157.

Werner, Y.M. (2008). “Schweden und die nordischen Länder”. In: Buchstab, Günter, and Rudolf Uertz, eds. Was eint Europa? Christentum und kulturelle Identität (306-334). Freiburg-Basel-Wien: Herde.

Zuckerman, P. (2008). Society without God: What the Least Religious Nations Can Tell Us About Contentment. New York-London: NYU Press.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-31

How to Cite

Kohtamäki, N. (2022). Innovative Public Governance. The Finnish Welfare State Model. Social Entrepreneurship Review, 2, 5-18. https://doi.org/10.15678/SER.2022.2.01

Similar Articles

41-50 of 71

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.