Investment attractiveness of impact-focused startups
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15678/Keywords:
investment attractiveness, social and environmental impact, venture capital , startup ecosystemAbstract
Background: Impact-focused businesses can offer unique competitive advantages. They increase operational efficiency and attract more investors.
Research objectives: This study aims to estimate investment attractiveness of startups, using the SWOT methodology.
Research design and methods: The study draws on case studies and SWOT analysis. The qualitative approach relies on WIPO reports and impact-focused startup databases. Fifteen case studies cover different industries and a wide range of economies.
Results: The findings revealed that the framework of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for impact-focused startups depends on their operational pathways.
Conclusions: The customer pathway’s strengths include the ability to address market needs directly and generate significant social impact. The employee pathway is strong thanks to improved workforce quality, diversity, and inclusion. The product/service pathway represents eco-friendly and socially responsible products with measurable impacts. The ecosystem pathway tackles global issues.
Downloads
References
Al Halbusi, H., Al-Sulaiti, K. I., Alalwan, A. A., & Al-Busaidi, A. S. (2025). AI capability and green innovation impact on sustainable performance: Moderating role of big data and knowledge management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 210, 123897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123897
Alvarez-Salazar, J., & Bazán, M. (2024). Startup growth in pandemic: Organizational resilience in an extreme crisis situation. Management Research, 22(4), 451–486. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-05-2023-1422
Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x
Banka, M., Chmiel, N., Kostrzewski, M., Sedkiewicz, K., & Salwin, M. (2024). Understanding corporate concerns: Barriers and challenges in corporate–start-up collaboration. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(4), 100388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100388
Bek-Gaik, B., & Surowiec, A. (2023). Sustainable business models in non-financial reporting in Polish practice. European Research Studies, 26(4), 1002–1024. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/3342
Bek-Gaik, B., & Surowiec, A. (2024). Business models of Polish fuel and energy companies in integrated reports. Economics and Environment, 90(3), 690. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2024.90.3.690
Bek-Gaik, B., & Surowiec, A. (2024). Integrated reporting and performance measurement systems (1st ed., Vol. 1). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003336068
Besharov, M., Litrico, J.-B., & Kislenko, S. (2019). The many roads to revenue generation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 17(4), 35–39. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Susanna-Kislenko-2/publication/335432599_Nonprofits'_Many_Roads_to_Revenue_Generation/links/5d657886458515d61029b37b/Nonprofits-Many-Roads-to-Revenue-Generation.pdf
Block, J., Hirschmann, M., & Fisch, C. (2021). Which criteria matter when impact investors screen social enterprises? Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101813
Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0620
Dean, T. J., & McMullen, J. S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 50–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.09.003
Eckerle, C., Finner, A.-S., & Terzidis, O. (2024). Investor perspective on impact-driven startups – the prioritization of certainty. Social Enterprise Journal, 20(4), 611–631. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-02-2024-0028
Filippelli, S., Troise, C., Bigliardi, B., & Corvello, V. (2025). Examining the influence of entrepreneurial ecosystem pressure on the economic, social, and environmental orientation of startups. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 210, 123900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123900
Grabenwarter, U. (2016). Measuring impact: A debate about the concepts of profit and value. In V. Vecchi, L. Balbo, M. Brusoni, & S. Caselli (Eds.), Principles and practice of impact investing: A catalytic revolution (pp. 101–121). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351284769-5
Horne, J., & Fichter, K. (2022). Growing for sustainability: Enablers for the growth of impact startups – a conceptual framework, taxonomy, and systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 349, 131163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131163
Hossain, S., Saleh, M. A., & Drennan, J. (2017). A critical appraisal of the social entrepreneurship paradigm in an international setting: A proposed conceptual framework. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(2), 347–368. https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/intemj/v13y2017i2d10.1007_s11365-016-0400-0.html
Idrissi, A. E. (2015). From necessity to opportunity: The case for impact investing in the Arab world. In D. Jamali & A. Lanteri (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship in the Middle East (Vol. 1, pp. 178–207). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137395368_9
Lago, N. C., Marcon, A., Ribeiro, J. L. D., Olteanu, Y., & Fichter, K. (2024). Quantifying the impact of inbound open innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 209, 123817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123817
Lo Mele, V., Quas, A., Reichert, P., & Romito, S. (2024). Impact orientation and venture capital financing: The interplay of governmental, social impact, and traditional venture capital. Finance Research Letters, 68, 105987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105987
Markman, G. D., Waldron, T. L., Gianiodis, P. T., & Espina, M. I. (2019). E pluribus unum: Impact entrepreneurship as a solution to grand challenges. Academy of Management Perspectives, 33(4), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2019.0130
Martielli, F., Laus, V., Salvi, A., & Kotaskova, A. (2025). Unlocking funding success: Intercultural entrepreneurship dynamics in European startups. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 21(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-024-01038-5
Niemiec, A. (2017). Istotność jako podstawowe kryterium selekcji kluczowych mierników dokonań (KPIs). Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 474, 265–275. https://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-0604b353-9a9b-4ada-8b34-551a02d6ba80
Okker, T., Auvinen, T. P., & Abrahamsson, P. (2022). Characteristics and actors of impact investing ecosystem from the perspective of technology startups. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 3316). Bolzano: 13th International Conference on Software Business Companion (ICSOB-C 2022). https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3316/industry-paper1.pdf
Parmenter, D. (2010). Key performance indicators: Developing, implementing, and using winning KPIs (2nd ed.). Wiley. https://kpiacademy.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Key-Performance-Indicators-KPI-Developing-Implementing-and-Using-Winning-KPIs-David-Parmenter-z-lib.org_.pdf
Razaghzadeh Bidgoli, M., Raeesi Vanani, I., & Goodarzi, M. (2024). Predicting the success of startups using a machine learning approach. Journal of Innovative Entrepreneurship, 13, 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00436-x
Roshan, R., & Chandra Balodi, K. (2024). Sustainable business model innovation of an emerging country startup: An imprinting theory perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 475, 143687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143687
Sahili, S., & Barrales-Molina, V. (2024). Analyzing how European startups generate eco-processes and eco-products: Eco-innovation implementation, financial resources, and patents. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(22), 10028. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162210028
Schaper, M. (2002). Introduction: The Essence of Ecopreneurship. Greener Management International, 38, 26–30. http://www.jstor.org/stable/greemanainte.38.26
Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. (2011). The new field of sustainable entrepreneurship: Studying entrepreneurial action linking “what is to be sustained” with “what is to be developed”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00426.x
Shuwaikh, F., Tanguy, A., Dubocage, E., & Alolah, O. (2025). Insights for sustainable business practices: Comparative impact of independent and corporate venture capital funding on financial and environmental performance. Research in International Business and Finance, 73, Part A, 102632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102632
Skoll Centre. (2024a). Amplifying local expertise for development: Supporting and connecting local drone, data, and AI experts. https://www.skollcentre.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/WeRobotics%20-%20Case%20Study.pdf
Skoll Centre. (2024b). An eco-sisterhood rising from rural India: Healthy, affordable, and dignified menstruation. https://www.skollcentre.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/Eco%20Femme%20-%20Case%20Study.pdf
Skoll Centre. (2024c). A world without harmful plastics: Bio-based and biodegradable packaging solutions. https://www.skollcentre.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/Greenhope%20-%20Case%20Study.pdf
Skoll Centre. (2024d). Bright futures start here: A social franchise for early learning. https://www.skollcentre.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/SmartStart%20-%20Case%20Study.pdf
Skoll Centre. (2024e). Connecting workers to opportunities: Matching migrant workers to affordable housing in India. https://www.skollcentre.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/Bandhu%20-%20Case%20Study.pdf
Skoll Centre. (2024f). Construction materials for sustainable cities: Harnessing eco-collection to transform tires into materials. https://www.skollcentre.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/Grupo%20Mamut%20-%20Case%20Study.pdf
Skoll Centre. (2024g). Energy solutions to fight climate change: Uganda’s leading manufacturer of eco-friendly briquettes. https://www.skollcentre.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/GBE%20-%20Case%20Study.pdf
Skoll Centre. (2024h). Healthcare for all: Affordable, accessible, quality primary healthcare for the underserved. https://www.skollcentre.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/iKure%20-%20Case%20Study.pdf
Skoll Centre. (2024i). Making the invisible, visible: Technology and data insights to strengthen eye health systems. https://www.skollcentre.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/Peek%20Vision%20-%20Case%20Study.pdf
Skoll Centre. (2024j). Nourishing the world with healthy food: Vertical integration for organic smallholder farmers. https://www.skollcentre.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/Fairtrasa%20-%20Case%20Study.pdf
Skoll Centre. (2024k). Quality, affordable and accessible emergency care: Ethiopia’s first private emergency medical service system (EMSS) company. https://www.skollcentre.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/Tebita%20Ambulance%20-%20Case%20Study.pdf
Skoll Centre. (2024l). Securing bright futures: Empowering refugee children and educators with digital technology. https://www.skollcentre.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/Thaki%20-%20Case%20Study.pdf
Skoll Centre. (2024m). Shifting the paradigm on housing: Regenerating slums where people can thrive. https://www.skollcentre.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/Community%20Design%20Agency%20Final%20Draft.pdf
Skoll Centre. (2024n). Transforming waste into resources: Deploying an off-grid model of dignified sanitation for Haiti. https://www.skollcentre.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/SOIL%20-%20Case%20Study.pdf
Smith, W. K., & Besharov, M. L. (2019). Bowing before dual Gods: How structured flexibility sustains organizational hybridity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217751692
Stefia, C. M., Haryanto, B., Wahyudi, L., & Setiawan, A. I. (2024). The impact of dynamic marketing capabilities (DMCs) and strategic information management (SIM) on international startup success: A meta-narrative analysis. Heliyon, 10(23), e40541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40541
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (n.d.). Business and SDGs. https://www.undp.org/sdg-accelerator/business-and-sdgs
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2024). Global Innovation Index 2024: Special theme 2024: Unlocking the promise of social entrepreneurship. https://www.wipo.int/web-publications/global-innovation-index-2024/en/special-theme-2024-unlocking-the-promise-of-social-entrepreneurship.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Social Entrepreneurship Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
